In this post at Build A Solo Practice, Susan does a good job of setting out the factors that lawyers should consider in deciding whether and how much to charge for the initial consultation.

Personally I do charge for consults and recommend other lawyers do the same. There are several reasons. Here are a few:

1. I do it for positioning in the mind of my prospective clients. I charge premium fees for premium service in my divorce practice. If I gave the consult away for free, it undermines that position.
2. People value what they pay for more than what they get for free.
3. You avoid the “tire kickers” who can’t afford you and are shopping for the low cost provider (which, even setting the fee aside, generally make the most difficult clients).
4. It makes it more difficult (though not impossible) for someone to get a consult for the sole purpose of conflicting you out.
5. It pre-qualifies the prospect. If someone is not able to pay my $300 per hour consult fee (which I apply to their flat fee if they hire me) then they will not be able to pay the fee to hire me. If that’s the case, it wastes there time and mine for us to talk for an hour.

In Susan’s post she makes a compelling case for new lawyers just getting started to give free consults. And, certainly you can make the argument that an hour spent for free with a prospective client is better than an hour spent twiddling your thumbs in your office. But, in my book, the sooner you can get to the point of charging for the consult, the better.